Feature #212
Publish a DKIM record for bitfolk.com and sign emails with it
Status: | New | Start: | 2023-06-15 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Low | Due date: | ||
Assigned to: | - | % Done: | 0% |
|
Category: | - | |||
Target version: | - | |||
Votes: | 0 |
Description
DKIM records have been published and used for rt.bitfolk.com and mailman.bitfolk.com for a long time, since most human-to-human emails sent by BitFolk use those domains.
BitFolk's transactional emails, however, such as invoices, reminders, alerts, etc. tend to come from @bitfolk.com addresses, which currently do not have a DKIM record. This should be remedied, and those emails signed.
This has become more important because there was a recent phishing attack that forged bitfolk.com email addresses. At the time there was no DKIM record on bitfolk.com, and the SPF record was an ~all (SOFTFAIL) so there was no strong automated means to tell that the emails were not genuine. The SPF record has since been tightened up to -all, though this is on the one hand not enough and on the other hand provides no way to tell if a legitimate email has simply been forwarded. A valid DKIM signature would give another way for recipients to allowlist genuine emails.
Subtasks
History
Updated by admin almost 2 years ago
- Subject changed from Publish a DKIm record for bitfolk.com and sign emails with it to Publish a DKIM record for bitfolk.com and sign emails with it
Updated by admin almost 2 years ago
bitfolk.com has had a _domainkey record published for some time, and the main outbound mail relay has been signing emails, but no DMARC policy was published.
Now publishing a "none" policy to see if there are any notable failures. There are going to be a bunch of VMs sending email as @bitfolk.com that aren't going through the main mail relay.
After these are caught and cleaned up the DMARC policy will be tightened ("reject").
Updated by admin almost 2 years ago
Amusingly this redmine VM sends email as redmine@bitfolk.com so that will need to be fixed. See issue #213
Updated by admin almost 2 years ago
Aggregate reports show that the Icinga host is sending mail as monitoring-bounces@bitfolk.com without DKIM signature, though SPF is already covered.
DKIM signatures added for this now.